Tanggung Jawab Moral Ilmuwan Dalam Perspektif Aksiologi Ilmu
Keywords:
axiology of science, moral responsibility, scientists, ethics of science, philosophy of scienceAbstract
The development of science and technology has brought significant changes to various aspects of human life. While scientific progress offers numerous benefits, it also raises complex ethical issues when science is developed and applied without moral considerations. Therefore, discussing the moral responsibility of scientists becomes essential, particularly from the perspective of the axiology of science. This article aims to examine how the axiology of science views the role and moral responsibility of scientists in directing scientific knowledge toward humanistic values. This study employs a qualitative approach using a literature review method, analyzing relevant books and scholarly articles in the fields of philosophy of science and ethics. The findings indicate that the axiology of science emphasizes values, purposes, and benefits as fundamental elements of scientific practice. Scientists are responsible not only for the validity of scientific knowledge but also for its social, humanitarian, and environmental impacts. Consequently, the integration of ethical values into scientific activities is imperative to ensure that science does not lose its direction and can function as a means of improving the quality of human life in a fair and sustainable manner.
Downloads
References
Journal Articles (Primary Sources)
Bakhurst, D. (2017). Axiology and the moral significance of science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 63, 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.03.004
Bird, A. (2018). Understanding the impact of science on society. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 8(2), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-017-0198-6
Bunge, M. (2016). Ethics in science and technology. Science & Engineering Ethics, 22(3), 871–882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9678-1
Douglas, H. (2017). Values in science. Philosophy of Science, 84(5), 757–778. https://doi.org/10.1086/694193
Elliott, K. C., & Resnik, D. B. (2019). Science, policy, and the value-free ideal. Philosophy of Science, 86(2), 302–313. https://doi.org/10.1086/701191
Habermas, J. (2018). Technology and science as ideology revisited. Theory, Culture & Society, 35(6), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418796331
Kourany, J. A. (2016). Socially responsible science. Philosophy of Science, 83(5), 826–839. https://doi.org/10.1086/687862
Lacey, H. (2019). Scientific research, values, and responsibility. Science and Education, 28(3–4), 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00032-5
Putnam, H. (2017). Science, values, and ethics. Journal of Philosophy, 114(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil201711411
Resnik, D. B. (2020). The ethics of science: An introduction. Accountability in Research, 27(4), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1717813
Schroeder, D. (2019). Moral responsibility in scientific practice. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25(3), 829–846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0027-4
Wolff, J. (2021). Ethics and public responsibility of science. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 38(2), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12432
Books (Supporting References)
Suriasumantri, J. S. (2016). Filsafat ilmu: Sebuah pengantar populer. Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
Suseno, F. M. (2017). Etika dasar: Masalah-masalah pokok filsafat moral. Kanisius.
Institutional / Policy Documents (Limited, Supporting)
UNESCO. (2017). Recommendation on science and scientific researchers. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000259639
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Monika Adela, Mardi Widodo (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.











