Tanggung Jawab Moral Ilmuwan Dalam Perspektif Aksiologi Ilmu

Authors

  • Monika Adela Pendidikan Dasar, Universitas PGRI Ronggolawe Tuban Author
  • Mardi Widodo Pendidikan Dasar, Universitas PGRI Ronggolawe Tuban Author

Keywords:

axiology of science, moral responsibility, scientists, ethics of science, philosophy of science

Abstract

The development of science and technology has brought significant changes to various aspects of human life. While scientific progress offers numerous benefits, it also raises complex ethical issues when science is developed and applied without moral considerations. Therefore, discussing the moral responsibility of scientists becomes essential, particularly from the perspective of the axiology of science. This article aims to examine how the axiology of science views the role and moral responsibility of scientists in directing scientific knowledge toward humanistic values. This study employs a qualitative approach using a literature review method, analyzing relevant books and scholarly articles in the fields of philosophy of science and ethics. The findings indicate that the axiology of science emphasizes values, purposes, and benefits as fundamental elements of scientific practice. Scientists are responsible not only for the validity of scientific knowledge but also for its social, humanitarian, and environmental impacts. Consequently, the integration of ethical values into scientific activities is imperative to ensure that science does not lose its direction and can function as a means of improving the quality of human life in a fair and sustainable manner.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Journal Articles (Primary Sources)

Bakhurst, D. (2017). Axiology and the moral significance of science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 63, 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.03.004

Bird, A. (2018). Understanding the impact of science on society. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 8(2), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-017-0198-6

Bunge, M. (2016). Ethics in science and technology. Science & Engineering Ethics, 22(3), 871–882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9678-1

Douglas, H. (2017). Values in science. Philosophy of Science, 84(5), 757–778. https://doi.org/10.1086/694193

Elliott, K. C., & Resnik, D. B. (2019). Science, policy, and the value-free ideal. Philosophy of Science, 86(2), 302–313. https://doi.org/10.1086/701191

Habermas, J. (2018). Technology and science as ideology revisited. Theory, Culture & Society, 35(6), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418796331

Kourany, J. A. (2016). Socially responsible science. Philosophy of Science, 83(5), 826–839. https://doi.org/10.1086/687862

Lacey, H. (2019). Scientific research, values, and responsibility. Science and Education, 28(3–4), 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00032-5

Putnam, H. (2017). Science, values, and ethics. Journal of Philosophy, 114(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil201711411

Resnik, D. B. (2020). The ethics of science: An introduction. Accountability in Research, 27(4), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1717813

Schroeder, D. (2019). Moral responsibility in scientific practice. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25(3), 829–846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0027-4

Wolff, J. (2021). Ethics and public responsibility of science. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 38(2), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12432

Books (Supporting References)

Suriasumantri, J. S. (2016). Filsafat ilmu: Sebuah pengantar populer. Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Suseno, F. M. (2017). Etika dasar: Masalah-masalah pokok filsafat moral. Kanisius.

Institutional / Policy Documents (Limited, Supporting)

UNESCO. (2017). Recommendation on science and scientific researchers. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000259639

Downloads

Published

2026-03-22

How to Cite

Adela, M., & Mardi Widodo. (2026). Tanggung Jawab Moral Ilmuwan Dalam Perspektif Aksiologi Ilmu. Learning Strategies: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 1(1), 20-28. https://journal.globalresearchmedia.com/index.php/learningstrategies/article/view/17